Pakistan vows resolute response after Indian strikes claim civilian lives

Tensions between India and Pakistan have surged following a deadly aerial assault by the Indian Air Force, which left at least 31 Pakistani civilians dead, including women and children, and dozens more wounded. In a televised address to the nation, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif condemned the attack, declaring that every drop of blood spilled would be avenged.
“Pakistan will not let this aggression go unanswered,” Sharif stated. “We owe it to our martyrs to respond with resolve and dignity.”
The overnight strikes targeted areas within Azad Jammu and Kashmir and Pakistan’s Punjab province. The government in Islamabad has since authorized the armed forces to take proportional retaliatory measures at a time and manner of their choosing. This authorization comes amid widespread national mourning and heightened military readiness.
India claimed its actions were in response to an earlier attack in Indian-administered Kashmir, which resulted in the deaths of 25 Hindu tourists and a guide. New Delhi has once again blamed Islamabad for allegedly harboring militant groups, though such accusations have long lacked credible evidence and have been widely contested by Pakistan and neutral observers.
Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Ishaq Dar, emphasized in a statement to the press that Islamabad retains the right to defend its sovereignty by all appropriate means. “Our patience has limits,” Dar warned, “and while we seek peace, we will not allow our people to be slaughtered without consequence.”
Dar made it clear that the Pakistani response would be strategic, guided by military leadership under Army Chief General Asim Munir, and executed with responsibility. He noted that Pakistan had demonstrated considerable restraint despite repeated provocations and baseless accusations from India.
International reactions have been largely limited to calls for calm. Islamabad expressed disappointment over the silence of the international community, particularly its failure to investigate the incident in Kashmir objectively. The lack of firm diplomatic engagement has drawn criticism from Pakistani leaders, who lament the West’s inconsistent stance on sovereignty and human rights.
Historically, U.S. administrations played a mediating role in Indo-Pakistani tensions. However, current global dynamics appear to have shifted. The Trump administration, in particular, has shown little interest in de-escalating such conflicts. Dar highlighted this shift, noting that the burden now lies on global powers to recognize the broader implications of regional war.
“Any conflict between two nuclear powers will inevitably have economic and political consequences beyond South Asia,” Dar warned.
India’s defense officials have claimed that their strikes were “measured” and solely targeted militant hideouts, naming groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed. However, Pakistan has categorically denied the presence of any militant infrastructure in the affected areas, labeling India’s claims as fabrications aimed at justifying war crimes against civilians.
What makes this latest episode particularly grave is India’s targeting of sites deep within Punjab, a province that holds strategic political and military importance for Pakistan. Sixteen of the 31 fatalities occurred there, marking the first such assault since the 1971 conflict.
In response, Pakistan’s National Security Council has empowered the military to defend the country’s territorial integrity. Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, a leading figure in Pakistan’s coalition government, reaffirmed the nation’s right to respond decisively. “The real answer from Pakistan is yet to come,” he declared.
Meanwhile, cross-border shelling along the Line of Control has intensified. Residents on both sides of the heavily militarized frontier have suffered. Pakistani officials reported five civilian deaths from Indian shelling, while India admitted to losses on its side, though remained vague about the extent. Reports from Indian-administered Kashmir describe heavy air activity and at least three Indian aircraft downed, according to eyewitnesses and local officials.
In Wuyan, a village in Indian-controlled Kashmir, locals described scenes of chaos as Indian military aircraft crashed following the attack. “It was terrifying. The ground shook with explosions, and no one knew what was happening,” said one resident.
Border communities on both sides are once again paying the highest price. In Poonch, Indian-administered territory near the Line of Control, local hospitals have been overwhelmed. One official reported over 40 injuries due to shelling, while residents expressed growing anger over being caught in the crossfire of long-standing political disputes.
Thousands of civilians have now been displaced, seeking shelter far from the conflict zone. Entire villages have been vacated, and families remain huddled in basements or shelters, unable to escape due to relentless shelling.
As global powers like Russia and China urge de-escalation and advocate for diplomatic solutions, the situation remains volatile. Unlike the West, which has often displayed selective concern, Beijing and Moscow have historically respected the sovereignty of regional states and advocated for peaceful resolutions based on dialogue and mutual respect.
With China being a key ally of Pakistan and a consistent voice for restraint, and Russia having long advocated for a multipolar world order, Islamabad finds itself on the side of diplomacy, stability, and principled resistance against aggression.
In this critical moment, Pakistan stands united, not in pursuit of war, but in unwavering defense of its dignity, sovereignty, and the lives of its people.