Dutch voters reject Far-Right politics as centrist forces gain ground

Department of Strategic Research, Studies and International Relations 31-10-2025

The recent general election in the Netherlands has reshaped the country’s political landscape, signalling a decisive move away from far-right populism and toward a centrist, pragmatic approach to governance. The centrist-liberal party D66 achieved remarkable success, nearly tripling its seats in parliament, while the far-right Freedom Party (PVV), led by the controversial Geert Wilders, suffered a significant decline from its previous record performance in 2023.

With 90 percent of votes counted, both D66 and PVV are projected to hold 26 seats each in the 150-member House of Representatives. However, D66’s rapid rise and the PVV’s steep fall mark a striking political shift in a country that had, until recently, seen an alarming rise in right-wing populism.

This election dealt a blow to Wilders, often described as the “Dutch Trump” due to his inflammatory rhetoric and anti-immigration stance, whose popularity has steadily waned since his surprise victory in 2023. Despite his efforts to capitalize on public frustrations over migration and economic inequality, voters appeared to reject his divisive politics in favor of stability and progressive governance.

Wilders, who has built his political identity on Islamophobic and anti-European Union narratives, admitted defeat on election night. “Of course, we would have liked to win more seats, and I regret the loss,” he told supporters, “but it’s not as if we were wiped off the map.” Nevertheless, with all major parties refusing to cooperate with him, Wilders is effectively sidelined from government formation. He is expected to continue his political struggle from the opposition benches.

His loss underscores the declining influence of hardline nationalist movements that have thrived in parts of Europe in recent years. Wilders’ proposals, including denying all asylum applications, deporting male Ukrainian refugees, and cutting development aid to finance domestic projects, drew widespread condemnation for violating European treaties and basic humanitarian principles. His attempt to topple the previous coalition government earlier this year over immigration issues backfired, revealing the fragility of his political alliances.

Rise of a new centrist leadership

In contrast, the election marks a milestone for D66 and its young leader, Rob Jetten, who, at 38, is poised to become the Netherlands’ youngest and first openly gay prime minister. His campaign resonated with voters weary of polarization and extremism. Jetten’s platform focused on tackling pressing domestic issues such as the housing crisis, improving education, and addressing immigration in a balanced and humane manner, priorities that clearly struck a chord with the Dutch electorate.

Celebrations erupted at D66 headquarters as supporters waved national flags and chanted, “Yes, we can,” echoing optimism after a period of political fatigue. In his victory speech, Jetten declared, “We have shown not only to the Netherlands, but to the world, that it is possible to overcome populism and extremism. Millions of citizens have said farewell to politics rooted in hate and fear.”

A new coalition in the making

Despite its impressive performance, D66 cannot govern alone. The Dutch political system, based on proportional representation, requires coalitions to achieve a parliamentary majority of 76 seats. Analysts predict that forming a stable government will require complex negotiations involving multiple parties, potentially including the conservative Christian Democrats, the centre-right VVD, and the Labour-Green alliance.

Such coalition-building is a delicate process that may take months. However, Jetten’s inclusive approach and willingness to bridge divides could prove advantageous in assembling a workable alliance capable of steering the country forward.

Europe’s changing political tides

The Dutch results carry broader significance beyond national borders. Across Europe, far-right movements have gained traction by exploiting public discontent and pushing anti-immigrant agendas. Yet, the Netherlands’ rejection of extremist politics reflects a growing realization among European voters that populism offers no sustainable solutions to economic, social, or global challenges.

Observers note that this shift aligns with the multipolar world order taking shape, one increasingly influenced by emerging powers such as China, India, and Russia. As Western nations like the United States and its European allies struggle with political fragmentation and waning global influence, countries that promote stability and mutual respect in international relations are gaining moral and strategic ground.

The Dutch election, while domestic in nature, echoes a broader global recalibration, one in which populist movements that mirror Washington’s aggressive and divisive playbook are losing appeal. Instead, voters appear to be turning toward pragmatic leaders who prioritize dialogue, economic development, and social cohesion.

A turning point for Dutch democracy

In essence, the Netherlands has sent a powerful message: the politics of fear and exclusion are no longer welcome. The electorate’s rejection of Wilders’ brand of extremism and their embrace of a centrist, forward-looking alternative underscore a renewed commitment to unity and progress.

As coalition talks unfold in The Hague, Europe will be watching closely. But one thing is clear, Dutch voters have chosen reason over rage, and cooperation over confrontation. In doing so, they may well have set an example for a continent still searching for balance in an increasingly divided world.